分类: (三区)金融风险管理师(FRM)资格认证考试考前强化培训资料

  • 全英文国际金融风险管理师(FRM)培训课程

    全英文国际金融风险管理师(FRM)培训课程

    FRM Training07-A.ppt

    FRM Training07-B.ppt

    FRM Training07-C.ppt

    FRM Training07-D.ppt

    FRM Training07-E.ppt

    FRM Training07-F1.ppt

    FRM Training07-F2.ppt

    FRM Training07-F3.ppt

    FRM Training07-F4.ppt

    Outline of This Lecture
    What is a swap
    Interest rate swaps
    Mechanics of interest rate swaps
    Pricing interest rate swaps
    Currency swaps
    Mechanics of currency swaps
    Pricing currency swaps
    1. What is a swap? Example
    Company A buys electricity from wholesalers and provides power service to consumers in California

    The electricity price selling to consumers is fixed, while the purchasing price from wholesalers is variable

    For A, the cash inflows are quite stable, but the outflows are uncertain

    In case such as the high oil price, the electricity price in wholesale market become very high, and the company may bankrupt.

    To manage the risk, the company may want to exchange their floating (variable) outflows with a fixed outflow or to exchange their fixed inflows with a floating inflows.

    The company can do it by using a swap.
    What is a swap?
    A swap is an OTC agreement between two parties (called counterparties) to exchange a series of cash flows over a period of time.

    Four major types of swaps:
    Interest rate swaps (IRS)
    Currency swaps
    Equity swaps
    Commodity swaps
    Some terminologies about swaps
    Notional principal: the amount of money used to determine the payments or the sizes of swap contracts. It may or may not be exchanged

    Initially, the value of a swap is zero. Thus, no payment is needed at the beginning

    Settlement date: the date on which a payment occurs.

    Settlement period: the period between two consecutive settlement dates

    Tenor: time to maturity
    Features of the swaps market
    Pros:
    Privacy: only the counterparties know your position

    Virtually no government regulation in U.S.
    Industrial self-regulation. Major regulator:
    ISDA: The International Swap and Derivatives Association

    Three concerns or limitations
    Difficult to find counterparties
    Now swap dealers make markets, and this problem has been solved

    Difficult to close before maturity: liquidity risk

    Counterparty default risk:
    This is an important concern in dealing with swaps.
    Swap rates depend on credit ratings
    Only deal with large firms
    2. Interest rate swaps (IRS)
    IRS are swaps to exchange interest payments in the same currency

    The most popular IRS is fixed-for-floating swap, also called plain vanilla interest rate swap

    1) Mechanics of IRSs
    In a plain vanilla interest rate swap, there are two counterparties: A and B.
    A: agrees to pay B a sequence of interest rate payments based to a fixed rate and a “principal”, called the notional principal.
    A is called the fixed payer

    B: agrees to pay A a sequence of interest rate payments based to the market rates, or floating-rates and the notional principal.
    B is called the floating payer

    No fund is exchanged initially.
    The fixed-rate is predetermined, called the swap rate.
    The floating rate in many IRS is LIBOR rate.
    Example: A Plain Vanilla IRS
    Company A entered an agreement with Bank B initiated on Sept.1, 2000

    Company A:
    Pays Bank B a fixed rate of 5% per annum every 6 months for 3 years on a notional principal of $100 million.
    Receives 6-month LIBOR every 6 months for 3 years on a notional principal of $100 million.

    The notional principal is not exchanged.

    There is no fund exchange at t=0.

    The actual payments are the net payments.

    Tenor: (the time to maturity): three years
    Plain Vanilla IRS
    Example: A Plain Vanilla IRS
    Cash flow to company A:

    Date LIBOR Inflow Outflow Net Cash Flow
    receive-floating pay-fixed

    09/01/2000 4.2%
    03/01/2001 4.8% 2.10 -2.50 -0.40
    09/01/2001 5.3% 2.40 -2.50 -0.10
    03/01/2002 5.5% 2.65 -2.50 +0.15
    09/01/2002 5.6% 2.75 -2.50 +0.25
    03/01/2003 5.9% 2.80 -2.50 +0.30
    09/01/2003 6.4% 2.95 -2.50 +0.45

    On Sept. 1(time t=0): the first LIBOR rate was known, and so the first cash flow was known. The subsequent cash flows are unknown, because the LIBOR rates are uncertain.
    Gain or loss: Depend on the difference between the floating rates and the fixed-rate.
    Zero-sum game.
    Note:
    The fixed-rate in a plain vanilla IRS is set so that the initial value of the agreement is zero

    Swap pricing is referred to determine the fair value of a fixed rate, called a swap rate.

    In this example, the floating payment is determined in advance and paid in arrears. Most swaps are of this type.

    e.g.:
    The payment paid on Mar. 01, 2003, $2.80 million, is determined on Sept. 01, 2002, based on the spot 6-month LIBOR rate quoted on Sept. 1, 2002, 5.6%.

    Some swaps are paid in advance, called in-advance swaps
    Some motivations of using an IRS
    Converting a liability:
    From fixed rate to floating rate
    From floating rate to fixed rate

    Converting an investment or asset
    From fixed rate to floating rate
    From floating rate to fixed rate

    Taking comparative advantages
    Example 1: Converting a liability
    Company A has a floating rate liability to pay a LIBOR+0.8% interest rate on a loan, and wishes to convert it into a fixed rate loan.

    A can enter into a plain vanilla IRS with a bank to pay a fixed rate of 5.5% in exchange of receiving LIBOR rate.

    Thus, in net, A pays a fixed rate of 6%.

    Converting a liability
    Example 2: Converting an asset
    Mr. Li has an investment which pays a fixed rate of 5.2%. Li wishes to receive a market rate.

    Li can enter into a plain vanilla IRS with a bank to pay a fixed rate of 5.5% in exchange of receiving LIBOR rate.

    Thus, in net, A receives LIBOR-0.3%.

    Converting a liability
    Example 3. Comparative advantages
    Company A wants to borrow $10 million for 5 years at a
    floating rate

    Company B wants to borrow $10 million at fixed rate for 5
    years

    The interest rates offered by banks:
    Comparative advantages
    The difference between the two fixed rates is:
    11.20-10.00 =1.20%

    The difference between the two floating rate is
    (LIBOR+1.00%)-(LIBOR+0.30%) =0.70%

    Though B has always to pay higher rate than A, B could pay a relatively lower rate at floating than at fixed, comparing to the rates A pays.

    That is, though A has absolute advantages in two markets, B has comparative advantage in floating.

    The comparative advantage is 1.20-0.70=0.50%

    A should borrow at fixed and B should borrow at floating, then, they exchange the loans to meet their needs.
    Comparative advantages
    To take the comparative advantage:

    A borrows at the fixed rate, paying: 10%

    B borrows at the floating rate, paying:

    LIBOR + 1%

    A and B enter a swap in which A pays LIBOR to B, and B pays fixed 9.95% to A.

  • 2010 FRM Examination Study Guide下载

    2010 FRM Examination Study Guide.pdf下载

    Quantitative Analysis Part I Exam Weight . 20%
    ·Probability distributions
    ·Mean, standard deviation, correlation, skewness, and kurtosis
    ·Estimating parameters of distributions
    ·Linear regression
    ·Statistical inference and hypothesis testing
    ·Estimating correlation and volatility: EWMA, GARCH models
    ·Maximum likelihood methods
    ·Volatility term structures
    ·Simulation methods
    Readings for Quantitative Analysis
    8. Damodar Gujarati, Essentials of Econometrics, 3rd Edition (New York: McGraw〩ill, 2006).
    ·Chapter 1 . . . . . . . . . . . The Nature and Scope of Econometrics
    ·Chapter 2 . . . . . . . . . . . Review of Statistics: Probability and Probability Distributions
    ·Chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . Characteristics of Probability Distributions
    ·Chapter 4 . . . . . . . . . . . Some Important Probability Distributions
    ·Chapter 5 . . . . . . . . . . . Statistical Inference: Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
    ·Chapter 6 . . . . . . . . . . . Basic Ideas of Linear Regression: The Two Variable Model
    ·Chapter 7 . . . . . . . . . . . The Two Variable Model: Hypothesis Testing
    ·Chapter 8 . . . . . . . . . . . Multiple Regression: Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
    9. Jorion, Value at Risk, 3rd Edition.
    ·Chapter 12 . . . . . . . . . . Monte Carlo Methods
    10. John Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th Edition (New York: Prentice Hall, 2009).
    ·Chapter 21 . . . . . . . . . . Estimating Volatilities and Correlations
    11. Svetlozar Rachev, Christian Menn, and Frank Fabozzi, Fat-Tailed and Skewed Asset Return Distributions: Implications
    for Risk Management, Portfolio Selection and Option Pricing (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2005).
    ·Chapter 2 . . . . . . . . . . . Discrete Probability Distributions
    ·Chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . Continuous Probability Distributions
    12. Linda Allen, Jacob Boudoukh and Anthony Saunders, Understanding Market, Credit and Operational Risk: The Value at
    Risk Approach (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004).
    ·Chapter 2 . . . . . . . . . . . Quantifying Volatility in VaR Models

  • 金融风险管理师(FRM)考试2009全景班讲义

    金融风险管理师(FRM)考试2009全景班讲义

    Risk & Hazard …
    What is risk?
    We care about …
    What is the possibility of this risks occur?
    If this happen, what influences they may left?
    how big the loses are?
    Are this loses predictable?
    What to do to make effective risk management?

    FRM Exam in 2009

    Valuation and Risk Models

    Value゛t㏑isk (VaR)
    o Definition and methods
    o Delta 1

  • 巴塞尔新资本协议(中英文)对照版

    巴塞尔新资本协议(中英文)对照版

    概 述

    导言
    1. 巴塞尔银行监管委员会(以下简称委员会)现公布巴塞尔新资本协议(Basel II, 以下简称巴塞尔II)第三次征求意见稿(CP3,以下简称第三稿)。第三稿的公布是构建新资本充足率框架的一项重大步骤。委员会的目标仍然是在今年第四季度完成新协议,并于2006年底在成员国开始实施。

    2. 委员会认为,完善资本充足率框架有两方面的公共政策利好。一是建立不仅包括最低资本而且还包括监管当局的监督检查和市场纪律的资本管理规定。二是大幅度提高最低资本要求的风险敏感度。
    3. 完善的资本充足率框架,旨在促进鼓励银行强化风险管理能力,不断提高风险评估水平。委员会认为,实现这一目标的途径是,将资本规定与当今的现代化风险管理作法紧密地结合起来,在监管实践中并通过有关风险和资本的信息披露,确保对风险的重视。
    4. 委员会修改资本协议的一项重要内容,就是加强与业内人士和非成员国监管人员之间的对话。通过多次征求意见,委员会认为,包括多项选择方案的新框架不仅适用于十国集团国家,而且也适用于世界各国的银行和银行体系。
    5. 委员会另一项同等重要的工作,就是研究参加新协议定量测算影响分析各行提出的反馈意见。这方面研究工作的目的,就是掌握各国银行提供的有关新协议各项建议对各行资产将产生何种影响。特别要指出,委员会注意到,来自40多个国家规模及复杂程度各异的350多家银行参加了近期开展的定量影响分析(以下称简QIS3)。正如另一份文件所指出,QIS3的结果表明,调整后新框架规定的资本要求总体上与委员会的既定目标相一致。

    6. 本文由两部分内容组成。第一部分简单介绍新资本充足框架的内容及有关实施方面的问题。在此主要的考虑是,加深读者对新协议银行各项选择方案的认识。第二部分技术性较强,大体描述了在2002年10月公布的QIS3技术指导文件之后对新协议有关规定所做的修改。
    第一部分 新协议的主要内容
    7. 新协议由三大支柱组成:一是最低资本要求,二是监管当局对资本充足率的监督检查,三是信息披露。三大支柱的内容概括如下:

    Introduction
    1. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Committee) is releasing this overview paper as an accompaniment to its third consultative paper (CP3) on the New Basel Capital Accord (also known as Basel II). The issuance of CP3 represents an important step in putting the new capital adequacy framework in place. The Committee’s goal continues to be to finalise the New Accord by the fourth quarter of this year with implementation to take effect in member countries by year end 2006.
    2. The Committee believes that important public policy benefits can be obtained by improving the capital adequacy framework along two important dimensions. First, by developing capital regulation that encompasses not only minimum capital requirements, but also supervisory review and market discipline. Second, by increasing substantially the risk sensitivity of the minimum capital requirements.
    3. An improved capital adequacy framework is intended to foster a strong emphasis on risk management and to encourage ongoing improvements in banks’ risk assessment capabilities. The Committee believes this can be accomplished by closely aligning banks’ capital requirements with prevailing modern risk management practices, and by ensuring that this emphasis on risk makes its way into supervisory practices and into market discipline through enhanced risk- and capital-related disclosures.
    4. A critical component of the Committee’s efforts to revise the Basel Accord has been its extensive dialogue with industry participants and with supervisors from outside member countries. As a result of these consultations, the Committee believes the new framework with its various options will be suitable not only within the G10 but also for banks and for countries around the world to apply to their banking systems.

  • Financial Risk Manager Handbook – 英文第5版-影印

    Financial Risk Manager Handbook – 英文第5版-影印

  • FRM Study Notes book 1~book 5

    FRM Study Notes book 1~book 5

    PDF影印文件下载

  • 2008 FRM Practice Exams PDF下载

    2008 FRM Practice Exams PDF下载

  • Solutions Manual for Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives

    Solutions Manual for Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives 5th edition下载

  • Options Futures and Other Derivatives 7th edition 原版书下载

    Options Futures and Other Derivatives 7th edition 原版书下载

  • Solutions Manual for Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives

    Solutions Manual for Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives 7th edition下载