作者: bankr

  • Australia in its first recession in 29 years as March quarter GDP shrinks

    GDP figures from the Bureau of Statistics show Australia’s economy shrank 0.3 per cent in the March quarter, amid bushfires and the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic.

    This makes it certain that Australia will suffer its first recession in 29 years, as the full impact of coronavirus-related shutdowns occurred during the current June quarter.

    Economists widely define a recession as two consecutive quarters of GDP contraction, which are now certain to occur.

    The last time Australia recorded two consecutive negative quarters for GDP was March and June 1991, dubbed by then treasurer Paul Keating as “the recession we had to have”.

    Even before the full effect of the coronavirus hit, Australia’s economy recorded its slowest annual growth in more than a decade, according to the ABS.

    “This was the slowest through-the-year growth since September 2009, when Australia was in the midst of the global financial crisis, and captures just the beginning of the expected economic effects of COVID-19,” the bureau’s chief economist, Bruce Hockman, said.

    Economic ‘Armageddon’ avoided, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg says

    While admitting that Australia is now in recession, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said it could have been a lot worse.

    “Treasury were contemplating a fall in GDP of more than 20 per cent in the June quarter. This was the economists’ version of Armageddon,” he told reporters at Parliament House.

    “It was in this quarter — the March quarter — that consumer and business confidence fell to its lowest level on record. That the ASX 200 lost a third of its value and, on the 16th of March, saw its biggest daily fall of 9.7 per cent on record.

    “When combined with the ongoing drought, which saw farm GDP fall by 2.4 per cent in the quarter, and the devastating impact of the fires that were raging across many states, one looks back on the March quarter, and there wasn’t much good news.

    “Seen in this context, the fact that the Australian economy only contracted by 0.3 per cent shows the Australian economy’s remarkable resilience.

    “Indeed, Australia’s performance in the March quarter compares very well to that seen in other nations, with negative growth of 9.8 per cent in China, 5.3 per cent in France, 2.2 per cent in Germany, 2 per cent in the United Kingdom and 1.3 per cent in the United States.”

    However, Labor’s shadow treasurer Jim Chalmers took aim at the Government’s economic performance prior to the pandemic.

    “While the pandemic came without warning, long-standing weakness in the economy did not,” he said.

    “Even before the worst of this virus, even before the bushfires, we had issues with weak growth, and stagnant wages, and weak business investment, and productivity, and net debt in the budget had already more than doubled.

    Sarah Hunter from BIS Oxford Economics said that the nation looks like escaping a worst-case scenario akin to the Great Depression.

  • 英国央行总裁贝利就无协议退欧风险向银行业发出警告

    英国央行总裁贝利就无协议退欧风险向银行业发出警告

    英国央行总裁贝利警告银行业,在2020年底的最后期限前有可能无法与欧盟达成贸易协议。

    报导称,贝利与英国最大的一些银行召开电话会议,他在会议上强调,银行业需要加快准备无协议退欧的预案。

  • Ultra-rich to place more funds in banks amid liquidity crunch: Economists

    The ultra-rich are likely to boost their savings in banks amid the high levels of uncertainty in the overall economy, as banks increase deposit rates to lure funds, economists say.

    Perbanas Institute economist Piter Abdullah said deposits from high-net worth individuals would increase, defying the trend of an overall slowdown in third-party funds in local banks as lower-income people’s incomes declined as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

    “My guess is that the third-party funds that will increase are those from savers with assets over Rp 2 billion [US$138,403]. Meanwhile, savings under Rp 2 billion will decrease,” Piter said. Savings under Rp 2 billion, which are fully insured by the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS), account for 43 percent of deposits in local banks, while the remaining 57 percent are in accounts with more than Rp 2 billion, LPS data show.

    Third-party funds have been steadily increasing during the pandemic from 7.71 percent year-on-year (yoy) in February to 8.08 percent in May, Financial Services Authority (OJK) data show. Economists have voiced concerns over liquidity in the financial system as banks launch loan-relaxation measures that could dry up liquidity.

    Bank Indonesia (BI) has relaxed reserve ratio requirements for local banks to boost liquidity in the financial system and has allowed banks to trade government bonds they hold with the central bank should they need fresh liquidity. These efforts could free up more than Rp 800 trillion in liquidity in the banking sector.

    Aviliani, senior economist of the Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (Indef), said that to address potential liquidity problems, BI’s efforts to boost liquidity needed to be conducted as soon as possible to save banks.

    Some banks have increased their deposit rates to attract more funds. Bank Mega offers deposit rates of up to 7 percent, while Bank Mandiri, Bank Bukopin and Bank Tabungan Negara (BTN) respectively offer 6.5 percent, 6 percent and 6.25 percent, according to BI’s Money Market Information Center (PIPU) as of May 28, as published on kontan.co.id,

    “In normal conditions, [savers] would look for those with high rates, but in this situation, they will look for banks that they consider safe for them,” said Aviliani. She expected overall growth of third-party funds to slow down this year but that would not be reflected among high-net worth individuals.

    “For the upper income bracket, whose [funds] are not affected by their consumption, most likely their placement of funds will increase. Why? Because they tend to look for safety by placing their money in banks and in government bonds,” Aviliani explained.

    This is in contrast to the stock market, which is experiencing sell-offs as reflected in the downward price movement, she added.

    BCA, the nation’s largest private lender, confirmed the recent uptick in third-party funds. BCA president director Jahja Setiaatmadja said that the bank’s loan-to-deposit ratio of between 78 and 80 percent so far this year indicated its liquidity was in check.

    “Since early January, February, March, our liquidity has increased quite well, especially from current accounts and savings accounts [CASA],” Jahja said on May 27.

    BCA’s third-party funds increased by 16.8 percent to a total of Rp 741.02 trillion by the end of the first quarter this year, up from the Rp 634.66 trillion at the end of December 2019. The growth in third-party funds was contributed by a 17.3 percent yoy increase in the bank’s CASA and a 15.1 percent increase in the size of time deposits.

    BNI Syariah president director Abdullah Firman Wibowo said the lender also saw a 16.58 percent increase in third-party funds to Rp 44.86 trillion, around 65 percent of which are in CASA.

    “In general, the people’s faith is still high in entrusting their funds to be kept within the national banking industry,” said LPS chairman Halim Alamsyah during a media briefing with the Financial System Stability Committee (KSSK) on May 11.

    Banks’ liquidity and capital are therefore at safe levels, according to the OJK in its official press statement. As of April, the ratio of liquid assets to non-core deposits stood at 117.8 percent, well above the 50 percent threshold. Meanwhile, the ratio of liquid assets to third-party funds was at 25.14 percent, above the 10 percent threshold.

    Banks that have resorted to increasing their rates to attract funds are for the most part smaller banks looking to keep their customers from turning to big banks.

    “A high deposit rate is not something that banks desire. Increasing rates in a situation like this is actually dangerous as it grinds the bank’s profits and liquidity,” Piter said. “However, a smaller profit rate is still better than having liquidity problems.”

    He added that the risk of moral hazard caused by banks competing to offer the highest deposit rates would not occur as increasing deposit rates resulted in added costs, while corporations would innately try to optimize profits.

  • U.S. savings rate hits record 33% as coronavirus causes Americans to stockpile cash, curb spending

    • The personal savings rate hit a historic 33% in April, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis said Friday.
    • “There is a tremendous uncertainty and virus fear that is lingering and that is restraining people’s desire to go out and spend as they normally would,” said Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. 
    • With the U.S. consumer accounting for more two-thirds of the economy, the economic recovery depends on whether the increase in savings is a result of shutdowns or structural changes in consumer habits, analysts said. 
    • The increase in savings came as spending declined by a record 13.6% for the month.

    The coronavirus crisis has Americans hoarding more money than ever as widespread fear paralyzes consumer spending habits.

    The personal savings rate hit a historic 33% in April, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis said Friday. This rate — how much people save as a percentage of their disposable income — is by far the highest since the department started tracking in the 1960s. April’s mark is up from 12.7% in March.

    The swiftness and severity of a U.S. economic recovery hinges on whether consumers continue to stockpile cash or start to spend again. 

    “There is a tremendous uncertainty and virus fear that is lingering, and that is restraining people’s desire to go out and spend as they normally would,” said Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. 

    The previous record savings rate was 17.3% in May 1975, according to FactSet. The savings rate was elevated above 13% throughout most of the early 1970s. The increase in savings came as spending declined by a record 13.6% in April.

    U.S. consumers have amassed savings as the deadly coronavirus causes unprecedented economic and societal disruption. The deadly virus — which forced a government mandated shutdown of the economy — has caused more than 40 million Americans to file for unemployment since the virus was declared a pandemic. 

    “The saving rate is the residual of an extraordinary event,” Diane Swonk, chief economist at Grant Thornton, told CNBC. 

    With the U.S. consumer accounting for more two-thirds of the economy, the speed and robustness of economic recovery depends on whether the increase in savings is a result of the shutdown or reflects a more structural change in consumer habits, analysts told. 

    ‘Forced savings’

    Saving during the Covid-19 pandemic is especially unique due to the shutdowns. Hundreds of thousands of small and large businesses shuttered their doors in an effort to curb the fast-spreading virus. 

    There is an aspect of “forced savings,” said Swonk. 

    “There’s not much opportunity for many people to go out and spend money,” said Megan Greene, a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School. “With shops all closed and everybody locked up, the ‘shopportunities’ have dried up. That speaks to a kind of demand shock.”

    On the other hand, a more structural change in saving and spending habits with “scarring” in consumers can have intense repercussions for the economy. This occurred during the Great Recession and can exacerbate secular stagnation, which “keeps interest rates and growth and inflation all low for a long time,” said Greene. 

    “As long as the money is put in savings instead of being invested, then typically that tends to weigh on interest rates, it tends to curb growth and to weaken the potential of the economy,” Daco said. 

    During a crisis or a recession it is entirely rational for an individual to be more conservative with their spending and savings, said Marc Odo, portfolio manager at Swan Global Investments. 

    “The paradox is that if everyone across the broad economy is hunkering down, that only makes the recession worse,” Odo said. “The paradox of thrift is a negative feedback loop. The more people save, the less they spend; the less they spend, the worse the recession gets; the worse the recession gets the more they save.”

    Consumer spending habits will play a large roll in whether the economy recovers in a V shape, a W shape or a swoosh. 

    ‘Pent up demand’

    Bank of America — which touches half of American households — said checking accounts have 30% to 40% more money in them compared with 12 weeks ago, CEO Brian Moynihan told Thursday. But Moynihan is seeing a recovery in spending habits. 

    “That means that the stimulus is still in their accounts and it’s going to be spent. Part of it’s been spent but there’s more to come,” he said. 

    Ark Invest founder Cathie Wood, who manages $15 billion in assets for clients, said consumers will lead the economy out of this downturn, making up for the months they weren’t able to spend. This theory is consistent with V-shape recovery, where activity returns as fast as it evaporated.  

    “Sure there’s a lot of despair out there and really difficult stories, but if you look at the consumer as a whole, the consumer has this huge saving right now, and that, once the paralysis is done, that’s pent up demand waiting to be deployed,” Wood said. 

    Wood likens the current savings to the post-9/11 era, when consumers went through a brief period of “paralysis” after the attack, followed by a robust recovery in spending. During the SARS pandemic there was a big drop in retail sales but a year later, the data had completely recovered. 

    “So we actually think the market is beginning to understand this. That’s why we haven’t had the retest that most investors expected. What usually happens is a retest, but it doesn’t look like we’re going back to the old lows,” Wood said. “I think the market is seeing through to the other side of this cycle, and trends in motion before the crisis will remain in motion. That means businesses will have to chase to keep up with consumers as they satisfy pent-up demand.”

    Stocks have come way off their March lows on investor optimism about the economic reopening and a potential coronavirus vaccine. All 50 states have begun to reopen to some extent, two months after the pandemic thrust the country into lockdown. 

    Savings were increasing pre-Covid-19

    The savings rate was increasing, although less drastically, before the global pandemic. 

    This was largely driven by the elderly population, according to Swonk. Pre-Covid-19, baby boomers were pulling back on spending amid a surge in mortgage restructuring, meaning the older population was saving money each month and not spending.

    “Baby boomers are near or in retirement, which makes them more skittish than they once would have been,” Swonk added. 

    Swonk expects this trend to continue in the post-Covid era, as boomers are among the highest-risk groups for contracting the virus.  

    “There’s no reason to think that baby boomers who are most at risk, in a world where the well is still Covid-tainted, that they’ll drink from the well freely as consumers,” said Swonk. “There’s a reason to save more and they will.”

  • What Can We Learn From Gold’s Relationship to Other Assets?

    Gold typically does not trade in tandem with the stock market and often the two have a negative correlation. Gold is supposed to act as a safety net when markets decline and vice versa. Gold’s peak in the last two decades came during the Great Recession in August 2011, and the low over that period came in 1999 prior to the dot-com bubble.

    In the 2020 environment, with negative growth and negative real interest rates, gold has shined. Year-to-date it increased over 13% as of mid-May. Over the same period, the S&P 500 index declined over 9% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) declined about 15%.

    However, when comparing the performance of gold vs. the stock market over time, there is a notable difference depending on the time period being analyzed. Over the past 30 years, the price of gold has increased by almost 280% and the DJIA has increased by 800%. If we shorten the time frame to the past 15 years, gold has increased by 278%, almost exactly the same as its 30-year timeframe. But, the DJIA has increased by only 170%. If we go back 100 years, stocks have far outpaced the price of gold.

    Interest Rates

    Interest rates historically are a major factor affecting gold prices. Typically, when rates rise, gold prices suffer. This is because gold doesn’t pay interest or dividends and interest-bearing investments are more attractive. The fall in global interest rates over the last few years, including U.S. 10-year rates near historic lows, has also helped propel gold higher.

    The average annual rate of return on investment grade corporate bonds over the last 100 years is over 5%. Over the last 30 years, corporate bonds have returned approximately 450%, a 60% greater return than gold over the same period. Over the last 15 years however, the return has been comparable.

    Home Prices

    Unlike the historical correlation between equity/bond markets and gold, the change in home prices compared to the change in the price of gold does not have a direct correlation. While real estate and gold are each tangible assets and can both be used to hedge inflation risk, they do not tend to move together.

    U.S. Dollar

    However, changes in the price of the U.S. dollar can dramatically affect the value of gold since gold is denominated in dollars. Typically, a strong U.S. dollar is negative for gold prices since it makes gold more expensive for investors and governments of other countries purchase gold using their own currencies. If the U.S. dollar weakens, gold becomes less expensive for purchasers using foreign currencies and can push prices higher.

    Gold’s rally over the last year may continue as real interest rates, the biggest factor influencing gold prices, should remain supportive, even when the global economy improves.

    The Federal Reserve has all but rubber stamped an extremely accommodative interest rate environment and has signaled that even solid growth will not lead to interest-rate hikes this year. If COVID-19 continues to disrupt the global economy the price of gold will likely continue to rise. However, monitoring other markets can sometimes give us an idea about where gold could be headed.

  • This disaster could wipe out your finances – and few people are preparing for it

    • As Americans are still feeling the effects from the coronavirus pandemic, few are gearing up for hurricane season, which starts on June 1.
    • The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicts there will be 13 to 19 named storms hitting the U.S. this year. Of these, three to six of them will be major hurricanes with winds of 111 miles per hour.
    • Nineteen states and Washington, D.C., have hurricane deductibles, which can be as much as 5% of a home’s insured value.

    Indeed, Tropical Storm Bertha formed near the South Carolina coast on Wednesday morning.

    The cost of a natural disaster would catch people at their most vulnerable. Consider that more than 38 million people have filed for unemployment benefits in the last nine weeks.

    “If anything, the pandemic adds a level of complexity,” said Stern. “There’s a need to get an early start on things that would otherwise be difficult.”

    Where to begin

    Drafting an evacuation plan and putting together a disaster supplies kit are good first steps for individuals to take, but don’t neglect your finances.

    Here’s where you can start.

    • Know your insurance coverage. Your homeowners policy may not be as comprehensive as you think it is. You might be subject to a hurricane deductible, which can be equal to 1% to 5% of your home’s insured value, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

    This is the amount you’d have to pay out of pocket before your policy begins paying out.

    In all, 19 states and Washington, D.C., have hurricane deductibles in place, according to the institute.

    The states are Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    Be aware: Flood damage isn’t covered by homeowner’s insurance. You’ll  need to buy this coverage through the National Flood Insurance Program or the private market.

    • Make sure your coverage is up to date. Whether you have renters’ insurance or a homeowners’ policy, review your belongings and make sure they’re adequately covered. Renovated your home? Update your policy to reflect the increase in your dwelling’s value.

    • Boost your emergency fund. You don’t want to hit your retirement accounts or ramp up on costly credit card debt to help cover your homeowner’s insurance deductible.

    “People often talk about a minimum of three months of expenses, but maybe up to six or nine months would be a decent benchmark for an emergency fund,” said Stern.

    Direct spare cash toward that emergency fund if you can, including your tax refund.

     

  • 新冠疫情打乱年度压力测试,包括设计年度银行“压力测试”的美国联邦储备委员会(美联储FED)在内,对于可能出现什么结果,都毫无头绪

    美国金融监管机构、银行业者及其投资者,将首次得以一窥该国银行体系的健康状况。在新冠病毒疫情引发经济危机之际,银行体系正面临着企业和消费者违约急剧上升。

    包括设计年度银行“压力测试”的美国联邦储备委员会(美联储/FED)在内,对于可能出现什么结果,都毫无头绪。

    “那是10万美元的问题。实际上,它比那还要大得多,我相信美联储正在努力搞清楚。我们很好奇,我们不清楚,”代表美国那些最大银行的金融服务论坛(Financial Services Forum)的执行长Kevin Fromer表示。

    这可能意味着银行需要拥有的资本可能比原来预期多出数十亿美元,这最终可能迫使它们削减股息、缩减资产负债表或减少放贷。

    自2009年金融危机以来,美联储每年都以假想的极端经济冲击情境对大银行的资产负债表进行测试。最终结果将决定这些银行能拿出多少钱分给股东。

    然而,今年新冠疫情带来的实际经济打击从数个维度上都已经超过美联储2月做出的世界末日般的预测,这使得一些银行发牢骚,认为美联储可以取消今年的测试了。

    但恰恰相反的是,美联储在4月进行完压力测试后反而告诉银行业,它将要增加一项测试,以反映最近几个月迅速恶化的经济环境。

    美联储最后一刻的变卦,加上去年做出的其他修改,已经完全背离了压力测试的规则。

    “现下不必要地增加银行资本,可能会限制银行的财务实力,时机完全不对,恐将导致经济复苏降温,”美国证券行业和金融市场协会周五在一份报告中写道,他们呼吁美联储维持原计划。

    根据美联储4月会议记录,尽管银行业至今表现坚韧,一些美联储官员担心业者可能面临更大压力,因大规模失业导致更多企业及消费者债务违约。

    美国前四大银行–摩根大通(JPM.N)、富国银行(WFC.N)、美国银行(BAC.N)以及花旗集团(C.N)合计已在第一季提列200亿美元坏帐准备。今年接受压力测试的业者有34家,除了上述业者之外还包括高盛(GS.N)及摩根士丹利(MS.N)。

    银行业者表示,他们对于可能的结果毫无头绪,因美联储还没提出任何有关额外分析将如何运作、或者是计划调查哪些因素等细节。

    一些分析师预期,美联储将调整失业方面的参数,同时将大幅提高银行业者潜在贷款损失预估;目前失业率已经突破美联储2月假设的10%,而之前几年的贷款损失率则约为6%。

    前美联储官员、布鲁金斯学会高级研究员梁奈利(Nellie Liang)表示,美联储也可能调查银行对酒店等受困行业的风险敞口。

    “从公信力角度出发,他们需要十分严格,不仅仅是为了掌握已经发生的情况,”前美联储官员Tim Clark称。他帮助制定了压力测试,目前在游说组织Better Markets任职。

    疫情前达成一致的压力测试监管调整创造了另一项不确定性。今年美联储将把压力测试结果与其他资本规定结合起来,从而使银行整体资本水平更适应其业务组合。

  • 新冠病毒将使美国GDP减少15.7万亿,十年内无法恢复

    美国国会预算办公室(Congressional Budget Office)表示,这种新型冠状病毒将使美国经济损失近8万亿美元

      美国政府周一发布的一项估计数据显示,尽管所有救助资金都用于抵消疫情的影响,但在未来10多年里,新冠疫情可能会导致约7.9万亿美元的经济活动减少。

      美国国会预算办公室(Congressional Budget Office)表示,到2030财年,疫情将使实际经济产出(经通胀调整的名义GDP)较1月份疫情爆发前的初步经济估计减少3%。

      CBO主任Phillip L. Swagel在书面答复参议员Chuck Schumer的质询时表示,“企业关闭和社交疏远措施预计将削减消费者支出,而近期能源价格下跌预计将严重减少美国在能源领域的投资。”“根据国会预算办公室的评估,近期的立法将在一定程度上缓解经济状况的恶化。”

      受新冠疫情影响,在2020-2030年减少的名义GDP预计为15.7万亿美元,即5.3%,低于最初的预测。

      国会已经通过了2.2万亿美元的关怀法案,旨在缓解疫情大流行的冲击,并正在讨论另一项可能达到3万亿美元的措施。

      不过,据《联储模型预测美国二季度GDP腰斩 2万亿刺激计划“打水漂”》,第二季度美国国内生产总值(GDP)仍有可能出现历史上最大的降幅,而5月份的失业率预计将接近20%,为大萧条以来的最高水平。

      舒默说,国会预算办公室的估计强调了对另一项支出法案迅速采取行动的理由。

      “为了避免另一场大萧条的风险,参议院必须以强烈的紧迫感采取行动,确保每个美国人都有足够的收入来养家糊口,为他们提供一个栖身之所,”参议员在一份声明中说。

      CBO表示,由于预期通胀水平较低,该机构下调了较长期的经济增长预估,尽管政府已削减了所有公共支出,并从美联储获得了更多的救援贷款。

      该办公室还警告说,随着对新冠病毒的传播途径、最终的经济损失以及国会拨款措施的影响有了更多的了解,可能会进一步调整其预测。

      “这些经济预测存在极大的不确定性,特别是因为今年和明年疫情的不确定性和、疫情和社会距离如何影响经济、最近的政策措施将如何影响经济,以及在极端变化打乱了标准估计方法和数据来源的时期如何最终确定经济数据“Swagel写道。

  • 欧洲央行召开政策会议前,市场关注的五个主要问题

    欧洲央行周四将召开政策会议,投资者希望决策者出台更多刺激措施,以提振受新冠病毒疫情肆虐的经济。

    欧盟执委会已提出规模为1.85万亿欧元(2.04万亿美元)财政刺激方案来提振区内经济,这减轻了欧洲央行迅速采取行动的压力。

    但在很多经济分析师看来,欧洲央行立即推出刺激措施的理由很有说服力–欧元区第一季经济萎缩速度创下纪录,第二季的表现可能更加糟糕。

    以下是市场关注的五个主要问题。

    1. 欧洲央行可能将资产购买计划扩大多少?

    推迟出台新的刺激措施,将令欧洲政界人士继续承受实施刺激方案的压力,并让欧洲央行有更多时间来评估发行欧盟债券将如何影响其资产购买计划。

    很多经济分析师预计,规模为7,500亿欧元的大流行病紧急资产收购计划(PEPP)将扩充5,000亿欧元。荷兰银行则预计将增加一倍。

    经济学家表示,最近一次政策会议的记录,决策者近来的言论,黯淡的经济数据以及对政府支出和债券发行进一步增加的预期,都暗示欧洲央行仍有可能在6月采取行动。

    1. 欧洲的复苏基金计划确定会缓解欧洲央行的压力吗?

    欧洲央行长期以来一直敦促欧元区领导人在支撑经济增长方面做出更多努力,上周欧盟的复苏基金提案给这一希望带来较大提振。

    经济学家称,该计划仍需要得到欧盟成员国的一致支持,眼下不太可能推迟任何政策行动。

    如果获批,该计划将标志着向共同债务首次成为主要融资工具迈出一步。欧盟联合债券的前景可能会鼓励欧洲央行购买更多超国家债券。

    1. 欧洲央行量化宽松是否会涵盖“堕落天使”?

    许多分析师预期,欧洲央行将开始买进那些在疫情期间丧失投资级评级的公司债。但许多决策官员对于购入这类高风险债券抱持怀疑态度。

    欧洲央行4月选择不将“堕落天使”纳入量化宽松范围之内,仅放宽相关规定,允许以近期落入垃圾级的资产作为贷款抵押品,令市场感到失望。

    荷兰国际集团(ING)的Jeroen van den Broek预期,未来12-18个月将会有约1,000亿欧元的欧元区公司债将落入垃圾级。

    1. 最新经济预期会如何?

    欧洲央行总裁拉加德目前预期,欧元区经济今年将萎缩8-12%,稍早的预估为萎缩5-12%。

    周四的欧洲央行经济预期料反映更为悲观的观点,可能为更多刺激措施提供理据。

    通胀预期也是关注焦点,欧洲央行目前尚未给出新冠危机将如何影响物价增长的评估。

    1. 德国法院的裁决是否已损及欧洲央行“不惜一切代价”的能力?

    德国宪法法院5月的裁决对欧洲央行的独立性发起挑战,恐将使得该行最新强力工具–大流行病紧急资产收购计划(PEPP)–面临威胁。

    欧洲央行必须在8月之前说明其立场,否则德国央行必须停止为欧洲央行量化宽松计划收购德国债券。拉加德周四将在欧洲央行的回应方面承压。

    消息人士上周向路透表示,欧洲央行正在草拟多项紧急计划,以在德国央行缺席下执行数以万亿季的购债计划。

    分析师预期欧洲央行将强调其独立性,以及其对于刺激计划的承诺。

    “德国法院裁决看来更像是增加阻力,而非改变结果。这是过程中一个复杂状况,但最终不会改变其方向,也不会拖慢欧洲央行的决策,”Brown Brothers Harriman汇率策略师Ilan Solot表示。

  • 6月1日,中国银保监会网站公布了建设银行舟山分行因贷款管理不慎等违规违法行为被处罚的信息

    6月1日,中国银保监会网站公布了建设银行舟山分行因贷款管理不慎等违规违法行为被处罚的信息。

     

    信息显示,建设银行舟山分行存在贷款管理不审慎,导致贷款形成风险;还存在要求授信客户购买保险并获取手续费以增加中间业务收入;财务顾问服务收费质价不符的违法违规行为。

     

    2020年5月22日,中国银保监会舟山监管分局根据《中华人民共和国银行业监督管理法》第四十六条、《中华人民共和国商业银行法》第七十三条,对建设银行舟山分行处以罚款人民币85万元。